1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 20 Ariz.
  5. 20 Ariz. App. 53 (1973)
 

NEITMAN v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

No. 1 CA-IC 784.

20 Ariz. App. 53 (1973)

510 P.2d 52

Fred H. NEITMAN, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, University of Arizona, Respondent Employer, State Compensation Fund, Respondent Carrier.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

May 29, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davis & Eppstein, by Dale D. Tretschok, Tucson, for petitioner.

William C. Wahl, Jr., Chief Counsel, Phoenix, for respondent, The Industrial Commission of Arizona.

Robert K. Park, Chief Counsel State Compensation Fund, Phoenix, by George B. Morse, Tucson, for respondent employer and respondent carrier.

HAIRE, Judge.

The only question raised on this review of an award entered by the Industrial Commission is the extent of the benefits which a carrier who has filed a late Notice of Claim Status must pay to a workman without a compensable claim. Based upon its interpretation of the decision rendered by Department A of this Court in Kasprowiz v. Industrial Commission, 14 Ariz.App. 75, 480 P.2d 992

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases