PETERICK v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INS.

No. 1702-1.

9 Wn. App. 721 (1973)

514 P.2d 188

JUDITH S. PETERICK, Appellant, v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

September 24, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benson, Chadwick, Stege & Wines and Kirk R. Wines, for appellant.

Guttormsen, Scholfield & Stafford, Charles W. Mertel and John G. Cooper, for respondent.


CALLOW, J.

The plaintiff brought suit for benefits claimed under an insurance policy issued by the defendant. The trial court granted a defense motion for summary judgment, dismissed the plaintiff's complaint, and denied the motion of the plaintiff for summary judgment. The sole issue concerns whether coverage existed under the policy for the death of the husband of the plaintiff, and, more specifically, whether the vehicle...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases