1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 56 Wis.2d
  5. 56 Wis.2d 654 (1973)
 

MEKE v. NICOL

No. 244.

56 Wis.2d 654 (1973)

203 N.W.2d 129

MEKE, Respondent, v. NICOL, Appellant: GRUNDY, Defendant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided January 3, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Leo H. Hansen and Hansen, Eggers, Berres & Kelley, S.C., all of Beloit, and oral argument by Leo H. Hansen.

For the respondent there was a brief by Korth, Rodd, Sommer & Mouw, S.C., attorneys, of Rhinelander, and William E. Schirger of counsel, of Rockford, Illinois, and oral argument by Richard E. Sommer.

HANLEY, J.

The following issues are presented on this appeal:

1. Did the trial judge err in admitting evidence of defendant's financial worth?

2. Did the trial court err in admitting certain evidence as tending to show intent?

3. Was the jury's verdict a product of passion and prejudice such that it would preclude application of the Powers rule?

4. Did appellant timely serve and file...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases