1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 481 F.2d
  5. 481 F.2d 229 (1973)
 

UNITED STATES v. LASKER

Nos. 692-698, Dockets 73-1370, 73-1102 to 73-1108.

481 F.2d 229 (1973)

UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner, v. Morris E. LASKER, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, Respondent. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Raymond F. CARR, Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Dorothy Lubkert SHEA, Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Lamont H. MUNNS, Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Melville L. BISGYER, Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Martin L. ROEMER, Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Albert FERGUSON, Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Donald F. CARONE, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided June 11, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Nields, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty. (Whitney North Seymour, Jr., U. S. Atty., S. D. N. Y., on the brief), for appellant.

Gregory J. Perrin, New York City, for appellees Carr and Ferguson.

Max Wild, New York City (Rubin, Wachtel, Baum & Levin, New York City, on the brief), for appellee Carone.

Peter Lushing, New York City (Robert E. Goldman, New York City, on the brief), for appellee Shea.

Henry J. Boitel, New York City (Philip Vitello, New York City, on the brief), for appellee Bisgyer.

Jack S. Hoffinger, New York City, for appellee Roemer.

Before LUMBARD and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges, and WYZANSKI, District Judge.

LUMBARD, Circuit Judge:

The government appeals from an order of the Southern District dismissing the indictments against the seven appellees, Carr, Shea, Munns, Bisgyer, Roemer, Ferguson, and Carone. Alternatively, the government has petitioned this court for mandamus ordering the district judge to reinstate the indictments. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and we grant the petition for mandamus.

In seven indictments handed up February 25, 1970...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases