The petitioner contends that the record does not contain substantial evidence that the arresting officers warned him that his refusal to submit to a chemical test for intoxication might result in the revocation or suspension of his driving license and/or privileges whether or not he was found guilty of driving while intoxicated or impaired. However, the record contains the testimony of an arresting officer that the petitioner was given the warning required by section 1194...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
