1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 72 Misc.2d
  5. 72 Misc.2d 621 (1973)
 

RAND PRODS. CO. v. MINTZ

72 Misc.2d 621 (1973)

Rand Products Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Charlotte Mintz et al., Doing Business as Mint Factors, Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

January 23, 1973

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Bret Mintz, Benjamin H. Siff and Thomas R. Newman for appellants. Gerald Goldstein for respondent.

Concur — LUPIANO, J. P., QUINN and MARKOWITZ, JJ.

Per Curiam.

We concur in the conclusion directing judgment in favor of the plaintiff, but solely on the ground that since the plaintiff was entitled to possession, it was entitled to compensation for the use of its land (see, i.e., Oboler v. Miller, 146 Misc. 509; Talley v. James Everard's Breweries, 116 N.Y.S. 657; Christatos v. United Cigar Stores of Amer., 144 Misc. 322). The obligation does...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases