Testimony was adduced at the trial that the defendant had sold heroin to a police officer at two different times on September 28, 1971. Among other things, the defendant contends that the bail provisions of CPL article 500 are unconstitutional and that the trial court erred in permitting an in-court identification of him since there was evidence that the person making the identification had seen him in two suggestive appearances some months after the crime had occurred. The...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
