1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 269 Md.
  5. 269 Md. 419 (1973)
 

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY v. MOUSHABEK

[No. 84 (Adv.), September Term, 1973.]

269 Md. 419 (1973)

306 A.2d 517

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND v. MOUSHABEK ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided July 5, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ira J. Wagonheim and John M. Court, Assistant County Solicitor, with whom was Paul F. Borden, County Solicitor, on the brief, for appellant.

Jay I. Morstein, with whom were Stephen H. Sachs and Frank, Bernstein, Conaway & Goldman on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES and LEVINE, JJ.

SMITH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

We are here presented with the question of whether amendments to an Anne Arundel County zoning ordinance were properly adopted and, if not, whether their invalidity vitiates the entire zoning ordinance. We shall answer both questions in the negative.

On October 2, 1972, the County Council (the council) of Anne Arundel County (the county) adopted Bill No. 136-72, a comprehensive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases