Claimant was injured in a compensable accident on September 14, 1971. The board found, and it is not disputed, that since December 15, 1970, claimant had been employed on the basis of a four-day work week of 10 hours per day. Finding merely that claimant was a "full-time worker", the board affirmed the Referee's use of the 260 multiple. Respondent contends this is correct since claimant was working the same 40-hour week as when he had worked a five-day week of eight hours...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
