MATTER OF DAUBNER v. DINKINS


33 N.Y.2d 649 (1973)

In the Matter of Thomas B. Daubner, Petitioner, and Louis Okin, Respondent, v. David N. Dinkins et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Seymour Schwartz et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided September 21, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victor Kovner and Seymour Schwartz, pro se, for Seymour Schwartz, appellant.

Harold M. Hershman, Edward Honig and Irving S. K. Chin, pro se, for Irving S. K. Chin, appellant.

Louis Okin, respondent, pro se.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES and WACHTLER. Taking no part: Judge BREITEL.


Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: In our view, since the irregularities were, to quote from Matter of Ippolito v. Power (22 N.Y.2d 594, 597-598), "sufficiently large in number to establish the probability that the result would be changed by * * * invalidation" of the votes, the order directing a new primary election should be affirmed (see, also, Matter of Mack...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases