PER CURIAM.
During the pendency of the appeal lodged in this Court, defendants re-urged their motion for a hearing on a new trial. This motion had been timely filed in the trial court based upon allegations of new and material evidence that, notwithstanding the exercise of reasonable diligence by the defendants, was not discovered before or during trial, which evidence, if available, allegedly would probably have changed the verdict of guilty. After argument and consideration...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
