1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 199 S.E.2d
  5. 199 S.E.2d 483 (1973)
 

RYALS v. BAREFOOT

No. 7311SC555.

199 S.E.2d 483 (1973)

19 N.C. App. 564

James Olen RYALS and wife, Ruby Ryals v. R. B. BAREFOOT et al.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

October 10, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilson, Bowen & Lytch by Wiley F. Bowen, Dunn, for plaintiffs-appellees-appellants.

T. Yates Dobson, Jr., Smithfield, for defendants-appellants.

BRITT, Judge.

DEFENDANTS' APPEAL

Defendants' counsel on appeal, who did not represent defendants in any of the trial proceedings, states in his brief that he has diligently reviewed the record but is unable to submit any authority or reason as to why the judgment entered was not proper. We agree that defendants' appeal has no merit.

PLAINTIFFS' APPEAL

While agreeing with the court's conclusion (1) stated above, plaintiffs contend that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases