STOLZ, Judge.
In this action by an insured to recover hospital confinement expenses under his insurance contract with the defendant insurer, the trial judge did not err in overruling the defendant's motion for summary judgment where the only proof offered by the defendant as to the contended lack of coverage consists of medical opinion testimony, Rushing v. Ellis,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.