PER CURIAM.
The appellants were informed against, tried before a jury and convicted of grand larceny and of breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny. Following denial of a motion for new trial, they appealed.
Appellants (who will be referred to as defendants) contend the trial court committed error by admitting the testimony of an officer to an inculpatory statement made to him by one of the defendants, and claim prejudicial error because...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
