PER CURIAM.
Appellant, a hitchhiker, was convicted of murdering a good samaritan who stopped and gave him a lift in total disregard of the increasing danger inherent in such practice.
The primary contention made in support of reversal is that there was no evidence of premeditation since it appeared that appellant had been taking drugs.
We reject this contention. Appellant's ability to formulate his intent to rob his benefactor is ample evidence that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
