Judgment modified, on the law, by striking therefrom the first decretal paragraph, which declared the unconstitutionality of the ordinance section in question, and by substituting therefor a provision declaring that the use of the subject premises for ground floor business purposes and a second floor one-family apartment is a valid nonconforming use and that the right to such use has been continued and has not been abandoned. As so modified, judgment affirmed, with costs...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.