Judgment affirmed.
In our view, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's pretrial motion for a psychiatric examination to determine his competency to stand trial, as defendant failed to demonstrate any reasonable basis whatsoever for such examination either before or during the trial. We have examined defendant's other claims for reversal and find them to be without merit. Nor do we express any opinion upon the merits of his pending coram...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.