KENLEIGH ASSOCIATES v. HARRIS-INTERTYPE CORPORATION

No. 73-181.

279 So.2d 373 (1973)

KENLEIGH ASSOCIATES, a New Jersey Limited Partnership, Petitioner, v. HARRIS-INTERTYPE CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, et al., Respondents.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 19, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pettigrew & Bailey, Miami, for petitioner.

Fowler, White, Humkey, Burnett, Hurley & Banick and A. Blackwell Stieglitz, Miami, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Cleveland, Ohio, Rimes, Greaton, Murphy & Batchelder, Ft. Lauderdale, Bradford, Williams, McKay, Kimbrell, Hamann & Jennings, Miami, for respondents.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.


PEARSON, Judge.

We are presented with a petition for writ of certiorari to review an order of the trial court which limited discovery sought by the plaintiff. The petition urges that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in holding that all internal corporate communications are privileged.1 Conversely, the respondents contend that the trial judge was correct because (a) the petitioner proceeded improperly in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases