NAMY v. GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY

No. 72-2001.

480 F.2d 156 (1973)

Sam NAMY and Fatima Namy, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided June 8, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman P. Ochs, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Robert R. Rekiel, Detroit, Mich., for defendant-appellee; Davidson, Gotshall, Kohl, Nelson, Secrest, Wardle & Lynch, John R. Secrest, Detroit, Mich., on brief.

Before EDWARDS, PECK and KENT, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

This case was tried before a jury in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. At the end of plaintiffs' proofs, on defendant's motion, the District Judge directed a verdict against plaintiffs, holding that Mrs. Namy's proofs of negligent injury were too speculative to provide a basis for submission to the jury. We reverse.

At trial plaintiff, Mrs. Namy, testified, albeit in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases