STATE v. DUNHAM

No. 43445.

203 N.W.2d 406 (1973)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Richard O. DUNHAM, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 12, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Scanlan, St. Paul, for appellant.

Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Lyman A. Brink, County Atty., Adlai W. Brink, Asst. County Atty., Hallock, for respondent.

Heard before KNUTSON, C. J., and ROGOSHESKE, PETERSON, and TODD, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Defendant contends on this appeal from an order of the district court quashing a writ of habeas corpus that the state did not produce enough evidence at the preliminary hearing to establish probable cause for believing him guilty of the offense charged. After a careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not err in quashing the writ.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases