PATERSON REDEV. AGENCY v. BIENSTOCK


123 N.J. Super. 457 (1973)

303 A.2d 598

PATERSON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JACK BIENSTOCK AND MARIE BIENSTOCK, HIS WIFE, MAURICE SCHNEIGEIGER AND SONIA SCHNEIGEIGER, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND ALEXANDER HAMILTON SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, ETC., DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 16, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward D. McKirdy argued the cause for the appellants (McKirdy and Riskin, attorneys).

Mr. Charles T. Murphy, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent (Jeffer, Walter, Tierney, DeKorte, Hopkinson & Vogel, attorneys).

Before Judges LORA, ALLCORN and HANDLER.


PER CURIAM.

Our review of the record persuades us that there was error in the trial of this proceeding prejudicial to defendants and requiring a reversal.

The trial court should not have barred counsel for defendants from cross-examining plaintiff's expert, out of the presence of the jury, on the question of the comparability of the February 11, 1969 sale of the premises at 21 Carroll Street, Paterson, since comparability is a question for the court in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases