1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 360 F.Supp.
  5. 360 F.Supp. 219 (1973)
 

MON CHI HEUNG AU v. LUM

Civ. No. 72-3588.

360 F.Supp. 219 (1973)

MON CHI HEUNG AU, aka Heidi Heung and Arlene L. Gillespie, for themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. The Honorable Herman T. F. LUM and Wayne Y. Kanagawa, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Hawaii.

June 19, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ian L. Mattoch, Mattoch, Kemper & Brown, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiffs.

Peter J. Levinson, Deputy Atty. Gen., George Pai, Atty. Gen., of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants.

Before CHOY, Circuit Judge, and PENCE and KING, District Judges.

DECISION

SAMUEL P. KING, District Judge:

This is a class action challenging the constitutionality of that portion of Hawaii Revised Statutes § 580-1 which requires that a person be a domiciliary of a circuit for three months and of the State for a year before that person may apply for and receive a divorce.1 Jurisdiction is based on Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 2201, 2202...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases