MATTER OF GROSSMAN v. RANKIN


78 Misc.2d 490 (1973)

In the Matter of Arthur A. Grossman, Petitioner-Plaintiff, and John M. Gerity et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Intervenors-Petitioners-Plaintiffs, v. J. Lee Rankin, as Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, et al., Respondents-Defendants.

Supreme Court, New York County.

August 27, 1973


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur Grossman, petitioner-plaintiff in person. John Gerity, intervenor-petitioner-plaintiff in person. Norman Redlich, Corporation Counsel (Edward J. Mallon and Elliot Press of counsel), for respondents-defendants. Julian A. Jackson for Civil Service Bar Association, amicus curiae.


ARNOLD L. FEIN, J.

In this article 78 proceeding and action for declaratory judgment, respondents move (1) to renew a prior application to dismiss, (2) for dismissal and (3) pursuant to CPLR 3212 for summary judgment.

Before passing upon the objections raised by petitioners as to the propriety of the procedural vehicle utilized by respondents and the contentions of the respective parties as to the merits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases