STATE v. GOULD


123 N.J. Super. 444 (1973)

303 A.2d 591

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANIEL JAY GOULD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 12, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Noonan and Flynn, attorneys for appellant (Mr. John W. Noonan, on the brief).

Mr. Karl Asch, Union County Prosecutor, attorney for respondent (Mr. Lawrence H. Posner, Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief).

Before Judges KOLOVSKY, MATTHEWS and CRAHAY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by MATTHEWS, J.A.D.

Defendant seeks a reversal of his conviction by a jury for bookmaking. (N.J.S.A. 2A:112-3). He asserts three grounds: (1) the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress; (2) the State failed to prove an act of bookmaking on the day alleged in the indictment; (3) the prosecutor's comments on summation were highly prejudicial.

Evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases