BAILEY v. HOVDE

No. 307.

61 Wis.2d 504 (1973)

213 N.W.2d 69

BAILEY, Respondent, v. HOVDE and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided December 21, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Frank J. Bucaida and Axley, Brynelson, Herrick & Gehl, all of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. Bucaida.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by William L. McCusker of Madison.


BEILFUSS, J.

The appellants' principal assertion is that the proof is not sufficient to support a finding of fraud or mutual mistake by clear and convincing evidence.

The record in this case is quite extensive. All of the parties to the disputed document, including the attorneys who represented Bailey, testified as to their version and many exhibits consisting of contracts and proposals for contracts were offered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases