Defendant and two codefendants were tried for breaking and entering a business place with intent to commit larceny. MCLA 750.110; MSA 28.305. A jury found defendant and one of the codefendants guilty.
The defendant requested a substitution of appointed counsel and now argues that it was reversible error for the trial court to deny such substitution, citing People v Charles O Williams,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.