SINA v. SCHIFSKY

No. 43824.

208 N.W.2d 302 (1973)

Dorothy SINA, et al., Appellants, v. Roger M. SCHIFSKY, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

June 8, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Van Valkenburg, Comaford, Moss, Fassett, Flaherty & Clarkson, Patrick F. Flaherty and Daniel P. Plauda, Mahoney, Dougherty, Angell & Mahoney, and James M. Mahoney, Minneapolis, for appellants.

Murnane, Murnane, Battis & Conlin, and Thomas M. Conlin, St. Paul, for respondents.

Heard before KNUTSON, C. J., and PETERSON, TODD, and GILLESPIE, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, four of the five surviving children1 of Louis Schifsky, decedent, appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial. They brought this action to set aside inter vivos transfers of real property from decedent to defendant, the fifth surviving child, alleging that the challenged transfers were made neither with donative intent nor for a valuable consideration but were, instead, the product of undue influence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases