1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 365 F.Supp.
  5. 365 F.Supp. 140 (1973)
 

LARIONOFF v. UNITED STATES

Civ. A. No. 626-73.

365 F.Supp. 140 (1973)

Nicholas J. LARIONOFF, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

September 28, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen Daniel Keeffe, Washington, D. C., John A. Keeffe, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiffs.

Harold H. Titus, Jr., Arnold T. Aikens, Michael A. Katz, Washington, D. C., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case is before the Court on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment. The Plaintiffs are petty officers in the United States Navy wherein the Plaintiffs claim entitlement to a reenlistment bonus. They are classified as Communications Technicians-Maintenance (CTM), a service rating which at the time they enlisted was classified as a "critical military skill," and, thus eligible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases