1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 58 Wis.2d
  5. 58 Wis.2d 434 (1973)
 

ROZGA v. STATE

No. State 17.

58 Wis.2d 434 (1973)

206 N.W.2d 606

ROZGA, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided May 1, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief and oral argument by Phillip Berman of Milwaukee.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Robert D. Martinson, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Robert W. Warren, attorney general.

BEILFUSS, J.

Defendant contends that the in-court identification by Rita was tainted by an improper pretrial photographic and one-man lineup identifications.

The practice of showing suspects singly to persons for the purpose of identification and not as part of a lineup is usually questioned. Stovall v. Denno (1967), 388 U.S. 293, 302, 87 Sup. Ct. 1967, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1199; and Foster v. California (1969),

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases