BRITT, Judge.
Defendant assigns as error the court's extensive questioning of defendant's witness, contending that the court violated the provisions of G.S. § 1-180. The assignment of error is well taken.
The evidence showed that the alleged offense occurred around 3:00 p. m. and that Crooms was carried to the hospital that evening where he was examined around 10:30 p. m. by Dr. Van dooren, a urologist. The State did not call Dr. Van dooren as a witness...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
