PEARCE v. N.J. HIGHWAY AUTHORITY


122 N.J. Super. 342 (1973)

300 A.2d 358

EMMA PEARCE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY HIGHWAY AUTHORITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 6, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Rosen & Kanov, attorneys for appellant (Mr. Edward Roy Rosen, on the brief).

Mr. William K. Miller, attorney for respondent.

Before Judges FRITZ, LYNCH and FULOP.


PER CURIAM.

This workmen's compensation appeal represents another arrow from the quiver reserved for assault on the exclusionary "going and coming" rule.

Petitioner, employed as an "executive secretary" by respondent New Jersey Highway Authority, was injured in an automobile accident on the Garden State Parkway, a facility operated and maintained by the Authority. The accident occurred while she was driving to her work at the offices of the Authority in Woodbridge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases