IN RE BIEDERMAN


63 N.J. 396 (1973)

307 A.2d 595

IN THE MATTER OF DAVID A. BIEDERMAN, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 6, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Gilbert D. Chamberlin, argued the cause for Union County Ethics Committee.

Mr. Raymond S. Londa, argued the cause for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

The Union County Ethics Committee found respondent guilty of having violated DR 9-101(B), which reads as follows:

A lawyer shall not accept private employment in a matter in which he had substantial responsibility while he was a public employee.

The predecessor rule appeared as part of former Canon 36 of Professional Ethics. It was very similarly, although less precisely, phrased:

A lawyer, having once held public office...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases