1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 377 F.Supp.
  5. 377 F.Supp. 61 (1973)
 

ARNOLD v. BACHE & CO., INC.

Civ. No. 69-448.

377 F.Supp. 61 (1973)

Gordon ARNOLD et al. v. BACHE & CO., INC., and J. Samuel Sicherman, trading as J. Samuel Sicherman & Co.

United States District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania.

September 27, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laster, Strohl, Kane & Mattes, and T. Linus Hoban, Welles & McGrath, Scranton, Pa., for plaintiffs.

James W. Scanlon, Scranton, Pa., Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

NEALON, District Judge.

Now before the Court is defendant Bache & Co., Inc.'s1 (hereafter Bache) motion for judgment on the pleadings, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment in the above matter pursuant to Rules 12(c) and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The named plaintiffs have brought this action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated who were customers of J. Samuel Sicherman...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases