1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 41 A.D.2d
  5. 41 A.D.2d 395 (1973)
 

FLOYD v. URBAN DEV. CORP.

41 A.D.2d 395 (1973)

Thomas Floyd, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Resident Property Owners and Taxpayers of The Village of Ossining, Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. New York State Urban Development Corporation et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 10, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Palmison & Fiore (Irving Mariash and Andrew Fiore of counsel), for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Samuel A. Hirshowitz and Daniel M. Cohen of counsel), and Debevoise, Plimpton, Lyons & Gates (Samuel E. Gates and Robert J. Geniesse of counsel), for respondents.

NUNEZ, J. P., and KUPFERMAN, J., concur with LANE, J.; STEUER, J., dissents in an opinion in which MURPHY, J., concurs.

LANE, J.

In 1968 the State Legislature enacted statutes respecting urban development. (L. 1968, ch. 174.) The Governor, in a special message to the Legislature, urged the enactment of such a program, stating in part, "The need to transform our urban core areas into decent places to live in and work in is the priority domestic challenge confronting this Nation." (N. Y. Legis. Annual, 1968, p. 434.) It was significant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases