Per Curiam.
The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on April 4, 1956. In this proceeding to discipline the respondent for professional misconduct, the petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Justice of the Supreme Court to whom the matter was referred for hearing and report and the respondent, by affidavit submitted by his counsel, opposes the motion on the ground that the "basic allegations of the petition were not proved."
The...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.