1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 20 Ariz.
  5. 20 Ariz. App. 401 (1973)
 

RUSSO v. CITY OF TUCSON

No. 2 CA-CIV 1417.

20 Ariz. App. 401 (1973)

513 P.2d 690

Russell RUSSO, Thomas G. Cox, Vernon F. Dickerson, Jerold A. Cartin, J. James Murphy, William F. McDonald, Robert G. Clark, and Thomas P. Sylvester, Appellants, v. The CITY OF TUCSON, a municipal corporation, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Div. 2.

September 4, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Russo, Cox, Dickerson & Cartin, P.C., by Jerold A. Cartin, Tucson, for appellants.

Herbert E. Williams, City Atty., by Dwight E. Eller, Asst. City Atty., Tucson, for appellee.

KRUCKER, Judge.

Is the licensing ordinance of the City of Tucson as it relates to attorneys valid? That is the question presented on appeal. The lower court answered this question in the affirmative and we agree.

The appellants, members in good standing of the State Bar of Arizona and practicing attorneys in the City of Tucson, instituted this action alleging in substance that the licensing provisions of the Tucson City Code as related to attorneys were in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases