OPINION PER CURIAM, April 4, 1973:
The six judges who heard this appeal being equally divided, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.
In this appeal, appellant contends that he is entitled to a new trial because the Commonwealth improperly elicited from its own witness testimony that appellant had been involved in prior crimes.
Appellant was charged with...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.