1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 9 Wn.
  5. 9 Wn. App. 32 (1973)
 

COPELAND PLANNED FUTURES v. OBENCHAIN

No. 1207-1.

9 Wn. App. 32 (1973)

510 P.2d 654

COPELAND PLANNED FUTURES, INC., Respondent, v. DEAN F. OBENCHAIN et al., Appellants.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One — Panel 2.

May 29, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Isaac, for appellants.

Zelensky, Steere & Baldwin and Donald A. Mallett, for respondent.

HOROWITZ, J.

The question presented is whether a default judgment, entered in New York against a nonresident defendant on his unpaid promissory note pursuant to New York's Simplified Procedure for Court Determination of Disputes as authorized by the note, is entitled to full faith and credit in Washington. We hold the judgment to be so entitled and affirm the judgment for the reasons later stated.

On April 24, 1963...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases