OPINION
PER CURIAM.
The defendant was found guilty of the possession of narcotic drugs, to wit, cannabis, in violation of G.L. 1956 (1968 Reenactment) § 21-28-3, and subsequently prosecuted a bill of exceptions to this court.
The defendant's contention that the ruling of the trial justice excluding the testimony of an expert witness proffered for the purpose of rebutting the statutory classification of cannabis as a narcotic drug constituted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.