1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 226 Pa.Super.
  5. 226 Pa.Super. 181 (1973)
 

COMMONWEALTH v. MARTIN et al.

226 Pa.Super. 181 (1973)

Commonwealth v. Martin et al., Appellants.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

December 11, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Harting, William C. Haynes, Richard C. Shay, and Theodore S. Danforth, Public Defender, for appellants.

Michael H. Ranck, James R. Leonard, Jr., Louise G. Herr, George T. Brubaker, and Andrew F. Lucarelli, Assistant District Attorneys, and D. Richard Eckman, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before WRIGHT, P. J., WATKINS, JACOBS, HOFFMAN, SPAULDING, CERCONE, and SPAETH, JJ.

OPINION PER CURIAM, December 11, 1973:

The six judges who heard and decided these appeals being equally divided, the judgments of sentence are affirmed.

OPINION BY SPAETH, J., IN SUPPORT OF REVERSAL:

Appellants contend that they were all six illegally sentenced in that as to each of them sentence was imposed without any reference to their individual characteristics, but rather in accordance with a policy agreed upon in advance by the three judges of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases