1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 57 Wis.2d
  5. 57 Wis.2d 344 (1973)
 

WOLD v. STATE

No. State 99.

57 Wis.2d 344 (1973)

204 N.W.2d 482

WOLD, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 27, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by James A. Drill and Doar, Drill, Norman & Bakke, all of New Richmond, and oral argument by Thomas C. Bell of New Richmond.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Robert D. Martinson, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Robert W. Warren, attorney general.

HALLOWS, C. J.

The child testified that Wold took her walking with a little boy and a dog in a field behind a trailer court where she lived and committed acts which would constitute taking indecent liberties. The fact she was molested was substantiated by circumstantial evidence. A construction worker testified he saw Wold walking with a boy and a dog in the vicinity and at the time involved. The clothing of the child, her...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases