COMMONWEALTH v. HUNT et al.


224 Pa.Super. 177 (1973)

Commonwealth v. Hunt et al., Appellants.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

April 4, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Michael Smith, with him F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, Jr., and Fitzpatrick & Smith, for appellant.

Vram Nedurian, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, with him Ralph B. D'Iorio, Assistant District Attorney, and Stephen J. McEwen, Jr., District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before WRIGHT, P.J., JACOBS, HOFFMAN, SPAULDING, CERCONE, and PACKEL, JJ. (WATKINS, J., absent.)


OPINION PER CURIAM, April 4, 1973:

The six judges who heard this appeal being equally divided, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.

DISSENTING OPINION BY HOFFMAN, J.:

The question in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying appellants access to certain pre-trial statements and records in the possession of the Commonwealth.

Appellants were charged with conspiracy to commit a burglary and burglary of a liquor store in Chester...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases