1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 35 Cal.App.3d
  5. 35 Cal.App.3d 359 (1973)
 

CAL-CUT PIPE & SUPPLY, INC. v. HARADINE PETROLEUM

Docket No. 31334.

35 Cal.App.3d 359 (1973)

110 Cal. Rptr. 666

CAL-CUT PIPE & SUPPLY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. HARADINE PETROLEUM, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

November 16, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Cominos, Shostak & Epstein, Eugene Epstein and Theodore H. Cominos for Defendants and Appellants.

Deadrich & Bates and Kenneth H. Bates for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

RATTIGAN, J.

This appeal involves questions of fact and law arising under the Oil and Gas Lien Act, to which we hereinafter refer as the "Act." (Code Civ. Proc., pt. 3, tit. 4, ch. 2.5 [commencing with § 1203.50].) As the Act has not been cited in a reported appellate decision since its enactment in 1959 (Stats. 1959, ch. 2020, § 1, p. 4660 et seq.), some of the issues presented are apparently matters of first impression...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases