ASSOCIATED REALTY CO. v. KIMMELMAN

No. 123, September Term, 1973.

19 Md. App. 368 (1973)

311 A.2d 464

ASSOCIATED REALTY COMPANY v. DAVID KIMMELMAN ET AL.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

Decided November 23, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Goldman, Jr., with whom was Mercedes C. Samborsky on the brief, for appellant.

Frederick J. Green, Jr., with whom were Lord, Whip, Coughlan & Green on the brief, for appellees David Kimmelman and Harvey A. Blum. Submitted on brief by John F. King and Anderson, Coe & King for other appellee.

The cause was argued before THOMPSON, POWERS and MENCHINE, JJ.


THOMPSON, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question in this case is whether or not the trial court properly granted a motion for summary judgment based upon the Statute of Limitations. We hold that it did.

On April 27, 1971, Associated Realty Company, the appellant, filed its declaration against two lawyers, David Kimmelman and Harvey A. Blum, appellees, alleging mishandling of a trial and appeal in the case of Associated Realty v. Cadillac Jack...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases