1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 33 N.Y.2d
  5. 33 N.Y.2d 1 (1973)
 

FLOYD v. N Y S DEV. CORP.

33 N.Y.2d 1 (1973)

Thomas Floyd, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Resident Property Owners and Taxpayers of the Village of Ossining, Similarly Situated, Appellant, v. New York State Urban Development Corporation et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided July 3, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving Mariash and Andrew J. Fiore for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Daniel M. Cohen and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), Samuel E. Gates and Robert J. Geniesse for respondents.

Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, BREITEL, JASEN, JONES and WACHTLER concur.

GABRIELLI, J.

The precise question presented is whether the New York State Urban Development Corporation (UDC) may plan and execute projects in disregard of local zoning laws. We answer the question in the affirmative.

Plaintiff, who purports to bring this action on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, is the owner of conforming property nearby a proposed urban development project. The complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases