WOLFE v. UNIVERSITY NAT'L BANK

[No. 70, September Term, 1973.]

270 Md. 70 (1973)

310 A.2d 558

WOLFE ET AL. v. UNIVERSITY NATIONAL BANK

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided October 26, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Cooper, with whom were Williams, Connolly & Califano, Edward Bennett Williams, Paul Martin Wolff, Stephen W. Porter and Frank W. Wilson on the brief, for appellants.

Jerome E. Korpeck, with whom were Peter R. Hartogensis and Wheeler, Korpeck & Nadonley on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES and LEVINE, JJ.


SINGLEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

In its simplest form, the question raised by this case is within what period of time may a depositor seek to hold his bank accountable when the bank has honored checks bearing only one signature, drawn on a two-signature account?

Because the appeal is from a summary judgment entered for the bank on the pleadings, affidavit, and depositions, on the ground that there was no genuine dispute as to any material fact...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases