1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 31 Cal.App.3d
  5. 31 Cal.App.3d 1 (1973)
 

PEOPLE v. ROBITSEK

Docket No. 11555.

31 Cal.App.3d 1 (1973)

106 Cal. Rptr. 925

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ZOLTAN ROBITSEK, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, Los Angeles.

February 6, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Zoltan Robitsek, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, David M. Schacter and Marshall L. Rubin, Deputy City Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

WHYTE, P.J.

In reading the statement of legal rights to defendants awaiting arraignment on traffic violations, the trial court advised them in part as follows: "A plea of no contest means basically that you submit the matter to me now on the face of the ticket. I will decide the case right here after reading the ticket and hearing a very brief explanation from you, or perhaps asking a question or two. The advantage of a no...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases