PER CURIAM.
Defendant-appellant was indicted for murder in the first degree, tried by jury, convicted, and sentenced to life imprisonment.
On appeal, one of appellant's contentions is that the trial court erred in overruling defendant's objections to hypothetical questions posed to the state's expert witnesses on the grounds that these questions did not reflect all the facts in evidence.
It is well settled that hypothetical questions need not be an...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
