CLARK, Judge.
This appeal is by a discount department store defendant against whom a customer obtained a verdict in a suit based on false arrest. As the enumerations of error are limited to legal questions it is unnecessary to detail the facts.
1. Appellant contends the court erred in admitting over objection the testimony of an attorney for plaintiff concerning the condition of the merchandise counters and the absence of signs prohibiting opening of packages...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
