STATE v. CLAY

No. 72-748.

34 Ohio St. 2d 250 (1973)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. CLAY, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 20, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Michael Nolan, prosecuting attorney, for appellee.

Messrs. Lavelle & Yanity and Mr. L. Alan Goldsberry, for appellant.


Per Curiam.

An examination of the record fails to disclose misconduct on the part of the prosecutor. Certainly there was no affirmative showing by appellant that he was entitled to a new trial. The jury resolved the facts of the case and determined the credibility of the witnesses before it, which was its responsibility. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of that court (29 Ohio App.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases